Max Mednik
  • Home
  • About
  • Interests
    • Angel investing
    • Magic
    • Scuba Diving
  • Blog
  • Contact

Readings and musings

Notes on One Mission by Chris Fussell

10/7/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
I was debating the pros and cons of various organizational structures with a colleague of mine who's a former Navy SEAL, and he was kind enough to gift me the book One Mission: How Leaders Build a Team of Teams written by Chris Fussell, with whom he worked on the Teams before.

Before reading this book, I always thought of "bureaucracy" as a bad word, but now I see why it exists and what important functions it serves. I also got a really good sense as to how to build a hybrid organization that aims to balance between periods of decentralization/agility/bottom-up with periods of stability/centralization/top-down.

I also really enjoyed hearing about how to implement O&I (Operations & Intelligence) Forums to get key stakeholders on the same page quickly using technology, and how to match the operating rhythm of a group with that of its environment/market. I aim to put in practice a lot of the major lessons from this book.

My major notes and takeaways are below.

Foreword
Strength and stability of hierarchy plus speed and agility of decentralized network
​
Intro
Trust
Common purpose
Shared consciousness/common understanding
Empowered execution. Decentralized. High accountability. 
Hybrid organizational model
One mission. Unifying empowering narrative. 

1 one mission
Intimacy within organization
Clans and objects as prizes after victories
Did you earn your trident today?
Squeezing hand of helicopter pilot = team intimacy. Trust. 

2 the hybrid model
Bureaucracy advantages plus network advantages
Bureaucracy removes subjectivity and personality and allows centralized control at scale
Manager as info hub between individuals who produce 
As you go higher up, you feel more distant from firsthand direct contribution and situational knowledge
Complicated to complex systems
Networks. Decentralized.  Relationships as dotted lines and not hierarchical. Clustering. Driven by narrative. Best for crisis and adaptation but bad for long term planning.
Hybrid model. Dotted lines for informal cross-silo relationships. 

3 an aligning narrative
Octopus Brains distributed throughout the body and can make decisions independently but also coordinated when needed
The starfish and the spider
Powerful narrative to align teams 
Strategic alignment. Balanced scorecard system. Management by objectives (Drucker). 
Credibility = proven competence + relationships + integrity
Horizontal alignment
Case study intuit
Quicken beat Microsoft money
Recurring forums to share knowledge

4 interconnection
Influencers, hubs, connectors. Focus on them first. 
No fly zone: new hires get 60-90 days to study actual web of relationships and how stuff gets done before can fly independently and work on big things
Boundary spanners: connect people across silos
Collocation. Virtual decision forums. 
O&I Forum. Massive videoconferencing forum which actually solves problem. Goal is collective learning not grading. Open exchange across ranks. Thousands dialing in for 90 minutes daily. 
O&I Controller
Not knowing was acceptable. Not thinking wasn’t. 
Agenda carefully designed and distributed ahead of time
Hyperlinks to detailed docs and contact info 
Live chat rooms with sub-threads between varied groups
Signing off and realigning by senior team. Reminder about what matters. 
Every 24 hours
Ground rules for attendance, punctuality, device free
Sample agenda items
Full time controller interviewed and hired to run the forum daily

5 operating room
Operating rhythm
Empowered engagement. Decentralized action. 
Balance between stability and fluidity
Balance and ratios
Consider speed and competition
Fighting al qaeda required 24 hour operating rhythm
Cycle between decentralized operation and resync with rest of org
Tactical moves faster than operational than strategic
90 min of O&I followed by 22.5 hours of execution
Can do this weekly if environment is slower
From x1 to x2
Delays due to dating of info as it moves up the chain
X1 is when new info tactically identified
x2 is when it’s acted upon
X2-x1=action gap/delay

6 decision space
Outline what actions team has authority for
Decision space is range of things a team can do during period of empowered execution and discussing during shared consciousness 
Key things from team of teams
Create aligning narrative
Building Shared communications forums
Driving shared consciousness at an appropriate operating rhythm
Hesitance: reluctance to take action
Deviance: stepping beyond allowed area
Positive deviants

7 liaisons
Better info sharing
Formalized role as opposed to boundary spanners

Conclusion

References
Prior book Team of Teams
The starfish and the spider
Give and take
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010

    Categories

    All
    Angel Investing
    Cacti
    Cars
    China
    Community Service
    Culture
    Design
    Djing
    Dogs
    Education
    Entertainment
    Entrepreneurship
    Family
    Finance
    Food
    Google
    Happiness
    Incentives
    Investment Banking
    Judaism
    Law
    Lighting
    Magic
    Marketing
    Medicine
    Networking
    Nolabound
    Philosophy
    Professionalism
    Psychology
    Reading
    Real Estate
    Religion
    Romance
    Sales
    Science
    Shangri-La
    Social Entrepreneurship
    Social Media
    Sports
    Teams
    Technology
    Travel
    Turtles
    Ucla
    Venture Capital
    Web Services
    Weddings
    Zen

    Subscribe

    RSS Feed

Picture
Picture
  • Home
  • About
  • Interests
    • Angel investing
    • Magic
    • Scuba Diving
  • Blog
  • Contact