I just finished reading The Effortless Experience: Conquering the New Battleground for Customer Loyalty by Matthew Dixon, Nick Toman, and Rick DeLisi. I had enjoyed Dixon's The Challenger Sale a lot, and this one was very interesting and eye-opening as well. The big idea is that customer effort is what hurts loyalty and brand perception, and lowering the perception of effort is more impactful than trying to overly delight or exceed expectations. The book gave a lot of concrete tips on how to measure and reduce effort, and I found the language suggestions around "experience engineering" a really smart application of behavioral economics to reduce the perception of effort. My main notes and takeaways on the book are below. Intro
Myth of extraordinary customer service that delights 1 new battleground for customer loyalty Easier to remember bad customer service than good A strategy of delight doesn’t pay. Consistently meet expectations creates loyalty Minimal return from exceeding expectations Delight is expensive Delight is rare Basic competence matters Satisfaction is not an indicator of future loyalty Not correlated CSAT not predictive of future Customer service interactions drive disloyalty than loyalty Most interactions are about solving a problem Customers hardly talk about good experiences We pick based on products and leave based on service Key is to mitigate disloyalty by removing customer effort Worst is having to contact company more than once on same issue First contact resolution FCR is best Issue avoidance Generic service is driver of disloyalty Having to repeat info is bad Perceived effort to resolve bad Low effort companies outperform Focus on getting rid of hassles Customer effort score should be tracked Delighting customers too rare and expensive and not the right strategy; removing disloyalty better Instead of exceeding expectations, focus on having them say “you made that easy” 4 principles of low effort service Minimize channel switching. Self serve. Next issue avoidance (not just solving current issue) Succeed on emotional side of issues Incentives that value quality and not just speed or efficiency 2 why your customers don’t want to talk to you Channel switching causss disloyalty Phone calls due to self service that is insufficient Era of self service first. Phone not valued as much. Simplify website to make self service easier Ask if someone tried to use self service and why it didn’t work. If didn’t try, mention it’s available. Failure reasons Customers couldn’t find the info they needed Too many choices Paradox of choice Customers prefer guided experience Big Preferences vs small preferences Customers care more about making their problem go away than the choice of channel Customers want task-based guidance based on their intent vs company dept structure Customer chooses what type of issue they have then give choices of channels with a recommendation Issue to channel mapping tool Remove channels like email which take more iterations to resolve than phone Customer found the info but it was unclear Company speak jargon Language complexity scoring Simplify language Eliminate null search results. Have results in customer’s preferred terminology. Chunk related info to make easier to scan Avoid jargon. Good task for new hires to find since they haven’t learned all the jargon yet. Use active voice Customer was simply looking for your phone number Don’t just hide phone number Better to incentivize self serve than block phone Feature common links to self service tasks 3 worst question reps should ask: have I fully resolved your issue today Customers don’t know what they don’t know What causes customers to need to call us back Related or spinoff issues coming up later Systems failures, staff failures Next issue avoidance Think a few steps ahead Track callbacks for any reason for some time period after a resolution Forward resolve related issues Brainstorm most likely call back reasons after a given issue type Upselling, explaining how to find info on site, sending email with follow up tips Suggest next issues and actions online in self serve also Measure next issue avoidance Measure something consistently 7 day window Compare reps to each other 4 just because there’s nothing you can do doesn’t mean there’s nothing you can do Experience engineering: carefully crafting language Customer’s emotional perception of the interaction matters most Actual Exertion and perceived effort different Effort is one third do and two third feel Not about soft skills training or being good listeners Best reps take control and confidently guide customer Engineering convo to improve perception of customer Advocacy and positive language and anchoring Outcome to customer is the same but path to explain it very different when the convo is engineered to explain how the outcome is better than some other choice Actively guiding customer in way that leads to positive interpretation of mutually beneficial result Anticipate emotional response and get ahead of it Focus on what solutions are possible not what’s not possible Reframing no Use positive language Chart of ways of saying something in 10 most frequent situations Don’t tell them what you can’t do. Tell them what you can do. Rep acting on customer side We will have availability on x date Our normal window is in 2 weeks but let me see if I can squeeze you in tomorrow Positioning alternatives with customer benefits Move several steps ahead and chit chat to learn more about customer situation so you can present useful alternatives Don’t be so fast with the no Focus on their interests and flexibility Don’t try to explain why no so much Don’t take customer request so literally Ask conversational questions to chit chat and learn about possible alternatives Keep positive momentum going and buy time Decision tree of questions to ask Track customer personalities in CRM like how much they like to chit chat and run convos based on that 5 to get control you have to give control Give autonomy to service reps Being curious Creative Critical thinking Experimental Advanced problem solving and IQ Resilient, able to deal with high pressure, able to concentrate on tasks, able to take coaching, control quotient CQ Qtip: quit taking it personally CQ varies the most by company environment Trust in rep judgment Allowing reps to go off playbook for certain situations Eliminate checklist scoring mentality for QA Different mastery levels of reps across skills Remove pressure of time or average handling time AHD. Better average talk percentage ATP metric of talking to customers vs all other work Rep understanding of alignment with overall company goals Connection to bigger mission Committee to turn corporate goals into department ones Peer support network among reps Need adequate time True best practice sharing Receptive reps Rep discussion forums Moderated by single frontline rep Ask customers about perceived effort 6 disloyalty score: measuring customer effort Customer effort score (CES) CSAT not as predictive of loyalty NPS too high level and masks support issues Transactional loyalty important to track Post transaction survey “The company made it easy for me to handle my issue” and 1 to 7 scale of how much agree with statement Effort important if low product stickiness or low switching costs Customer effort assessment (CEA) Dive deep into sources of effort across channels 7 making low effort stick Have compelling change story of why change necessary Explain current approach and why it no longer works, data backed explanation of what needs to change, and plan for how org will support the transition Sample story and script Training and coaching both important Train beginning to end for a few most common issues Example training exercises in book Ask reps about personal experiences with other vendors that were high or low effort Network judgment and learning from network 8 effort beyond the customer contact center Eliminate lines Schedule technical support ahead of time Floating cashiers with phones
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
July 2024
Categories
All
Subscribe |